Dear Checkstyle

I am not a big fan of forced styles and all these errors that comes with it.

I know, I know… If you are on a team of more people, you don’t have much of a choice otherwise you end up with style chaos and naming convention that are closer to a standup comedian number than logic.

I am just not a big fan…

We have a style for the member name in our classes that only allows for letters and number but I did a class to match the json returned from Azure OIDC so it is all lowercase name with underscore. Checkstyle would not let this through so I learned quickly how to turn that off for my class

This is the module in Checkstyle:

<module name="SuppressionCommentFilter">
    <property name="offCommentFormat" value="CHECKSTYLE.OFF\: ([\w\|]+)"/>
    <property name="onCommentFormat" value="CHECKSTYLE.ON\: ([\w\|]+)"/>
    <property name="checkFormat" value="$1"/>

All you have to do is a comment:


and after my class definition I can simply turn it back on:

// CHECKSTYLE.ON: MemberName

Then I could discuss with a team mate and disagree about having an annotation (@jsonproperty(“name_with_underscore”)) for each member name to respect the checkstyle and work with the json. What is the simplest will always win in my mind and not following made up rules for the sake of the rule.

Published by


Java developper that loves photography and an excellent espresso

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s